Connect with us


Why Johnny Depp Couldn’t Save The Pirates Of The Caribbean Movies



Despite courting controversy, Johnny Depp remains an incredibly popular actor, yet he still couldn’t save Disney’s Pirates of the Caribbean movies.

While the franchise’s critical reception waned over its run, it has been incredibly successful financially, with Pirates of the Caribbean being one of the highest-grossing franchises of all time, raking in $4.52 billion. However, despite the series’ box-office numbers and dedicated fanbase, the fall of Pirates of the Caribbean can mostly be traced back to one thing: Johnny Depp’s Jack Sparrow.

Starting in 2003 with Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl, Disney’s swashbuckling saga has seen success since its beginnings, with the series spanning five blockbuster entries. While the films are based on the popular Disney Parks ride, the five Pirates of the Caribbean movies have gone on to develop their own rich and interesting lore, with some elements becoming so popular that they have been re-integrated into the ride. Over time, the quality of the films became increasingly poor, with the fifth and final entry Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales generally being considered the worst of the bunch. Sadly, what started out as a fun adventure series and loving homage to the ride quickly became a contrived, silly, bloated mess – and Jack Sparrow just made things worse.

Johnny Depp’s initial take on Captain Jack Sparrow was fantastic, with his performance in Curse of the Black Pearl bringing a fun and unique twist to the typical archetype of the pirate captain. Clearly being the standout in the films, Jack Sparrow quickly became the face of the franchise, with him now existing in the pop culture pantheon of Disney legends that few ever reach. Jack Sparrow was swiftly added to the various Disney parks, featured in spin-off books, plastered onto all kinds of merchandise, and more. However, Jack Sparrow gradually went wrong, becoming the driving force behind Pirates of the Caribbean’s fall from grace. As the character took center stage and increasingly dominated the narrative, Sparrow’s original charisma slowly became the series’ Achilles heel. As such, not only was Depp unable to save the Pirates saga, he arguably helped sink it for good.

Curse of the Black Pearl was an instant hit upon its release, making $654.3 million on a $140 million budget. The film launched Depp’s career as a bankable, bona fide action star, was the third highest-grossing movie of 2003, and was nominated for five Academy Awards. Curse of the Black Pearl single-handedly brought back the pirate genre, following a series of flops that concluded with 1995’s Cutthroat Island. 2006’s Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest was an even bigger success, making $1.066 billion on a $225 million budget, although reviews were worse than its predecessor’s. The subsequent three films continued this trend, selling more tickets while inflating their budgets, aggrandizing spectacle at the expense of story. Despite their steep decline in quality, the series remained popular at the box office, with Pirates of the Caribbean currently being the 15th highest-grossing franchise of all time. Pirates of the Caribbean was a pop culture phenomenon, one that could have kept going for ages if more care had been taken with the story.

Although it doesn’t seem like it now, Jack Sparrow isn’t actually the main character of Curse of the Black Pearl. While Jack has a lot of screen time, the original film’s story is actually centered on Will Turner and Elizabeth Swann, with the role of Jack being that of an eccentric side character. However, as the series goes on, Jack Sparrow creeps more and more into the spotlight, pushing Will and Elizabeth out of their leading roles. The films solidified this Jack Sparrow mistake in the fourth film, Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides, as Will and Elizabeth’s absence definitively makes Jack Sparrow the main character. He essentially committed mutiny on the series, taking over Will and Elizabeth’s franchise in On Stranger Tides. The decision to bring Jack Sparrow to the fore meant that he was inherently associated with the Pirates series’ other flaws, meaning that the character was unable to help save the franchise.

While a film centered on Jack Sparrow isn’t inherently impossible to make, the problem is that he never evolved across the five films; rather, Jack Sparrow devolved. While Jack Sparrow was drunk, silly, and hedonistic in Curse of the Black Pearl, he felt as if he knew what he was doing, with him truly deserving the title of “best pirate I’ve ever seen.” By the time he appears in Dead Men Tell No Tales, though, Jack Sparrow is only a shell of his former self, bumbling through the movies with no agency. In the later films, Jack Sparrow feels as if he’s a complete caricature that has no idea what he is doing, surviving based on luck and plot armor alone. Jack Sparrow in the latter half of Pirates of the Caribbean is the perfect example of Flanderization, the trope named after The Simpsons’ Ned Flanders. Jack Sparrow was given plenty of history, with the films sending him to Davy Jones’s Locker and introducing his father, but his characterization never changed.

By the time the Pirates of the Caribbean series was coming to a close, Johnny Depp’s starpower was the franchise’s only real selling point. Depp’s Hollywood popularity quickly faded though, following a series of films in the early 2010s like The Lone Ranger, Transcendence, Mortdecai, and many others. On top of his waning career, the mid-to-late 2010s saw the start of the legal battle between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. Due to this, the actor was dropped from lucrative franchises, with Depp losing his role in the Fantastic Beasts movies and Universal’s failed Dark Universe. Due to the declining popularity of the franchise and Johnny Depp’s loss of Hollywood influence, Johnny Depp was let go from Pirates of the Caribbean, essentially killing the franchise due to Jack Sparrow being the last leg it had to stand on. While many debate whether this was a good choice or not, the effect this decision has had on the once-great series is undeniable.

So, while Pirates of the Caribbean has floundered for the past few years, it seems Disney may be trying to revive the once-dead series again. There have been rumblings of a Margot Robbie-led spin-off or reboot, as well as rumors of Disney attempting to bring back Jack Sparrow, although Johnny Depp’s Pirates of the Caribbean 6 return seems unlikely. Although another film may one day be made, it is unlikely that the series will ever be as big as it once was. With the increasing focus on Jack Sparrow, Disney continued the franchise solely on Johnny Depp’s performance and starpower, and without him, it may never see the success it once did. The Pirates of the Caribbean craze of the early-to-mid 2000s is almost unmatched, and while a continuation led by Margot Robbie may be successful in its own right, it may never capture the lightning in a bottle that the original trilogy did. The later sequels built themselves on the power of Johnny Depp, and ironically, Johnny Depp is what killed Pirates of the Caribbean.


Johnny Depp Wished to Write ‘Pirates 6’ With Disney to Give Jack Sparrow a Correct Goodbye




Jack Sparrow is one of the most beloved characters, and many think that Pirates of the Caribbean 6 won’t be the same without Depp.

Johnny Depp reveals that he wanted to help write Pirates of the Caribbean 6 to give Jack Sparrow a proper ending before Disney fired the actor over the domestic abuse allegations.

Depp during the  defamation trial against Amber Heard  was asked if would return to the Pirates franchise after being hacked.

To this, the Fantastic Beasts actor replied that he won’t, even if he is offered $300 million. It was reported that the actor has earned that much by playing the role of the pirate in the first five films. His firing was criticised by fans and even more so now, as fans believe he is innocent.

I didn’t quite understand how after that long relationship and quite a successful relationship, certainly for Disney, that suddenly I was guilty until proven innocent…” Johnny Depp said. “I, in fact, had been approached to take part in writing Pirates 6…” he revealed. “My feeling was that these characters should be able to have their proper goodbye, as it were,” Depp added.

“A franchise can only last for so long, and there’s a way to end a franchise like that. And I thought that the characters deserved… to end their franchise on a very good note. I planned on continuing until it was time to stop,” he continued.

Not just Pirates of the Caribbean 6, Johnny Depp‘s role as Geralt Grindelwald in the Fantastic Beasts franchise was also sacked and went to Mads Mikkelsen. His general career in Hollywood also took a dip, especially after 2018 op-ed written by Amber Heard.

Now, as per the insider, Disney wants Johnny Depp to return as Jack Sparrow in ‘Pirates of the Caribbean 6’.

Disney is reportedly in talks with Johnny Depp to return to the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise as Captain Jack Sparrow.

The entertainment media giant has even offered $300 million to the Edward Scissorhands star as they are looking forward to the actor’s forgiveness, claimed insider.

Jack Sparrow is one of the most beloved characters, and many think that Pirates of the Caribbean 6 won’t be the same without him.

Continue Reading


Johnny Depp Once Did a Movie He Felt Wouldn’t Be Successful Just to Work With Christopher Walken




Johnny Depp | Gisela Schober/Getty Pictures

Nick of Time was a 1995 characteristic starring Johnny Depp as an unwitting pawn in a plan to assassinate a distinguished political determine. His Nick of Time function was a little unconventional for Depp given the films he often picked on the time. Depp was principally recognized for taking part in characters that stood out from most individuals in society ultimately. However Nick of Time had Depp taking part in the straight man.

In a 1995 interview with The Washington Submit, Depp asserted that he took the function with this status in thoughts.

“I favored the script,” Depp mentioned. “I believed it was a good time to make a change. I figured I’d do one thing else after being accused by everyone of taking part in weirdos. It was a possibility to play the straight man. It’s actually a problem to do this — you’ve acquired to hold the man attention-grabbing. It’s harder.”

Johnny Depp as soon as shared he solely did ‘Nick of Time’ so he’d get to work with Christopher Walken

Years later, Depp elaborated a bit additional about why he determined to tackle the function. Regardless of his status for taking part in bizarre characters, the actor didn’t need to add films to his prolific filmography the place he felt like he’d bought out. Which was why he was hesitant on taking extra commercially interesting tasks. Nick of Time was the exception.

“I’ve tried issues up to now the place folks thought I attempted to promote out. For instance I did this movie Nick of Time with [director]John Badham. I don’t know if the movie was notably good,” he as soon as mentioned in an interview with Gainesville.

However Depp was keen to brush apart his reservations for the movie if it meant performing alongside one in every of Hollywood’s biggest actors.

“I did that movie not for cash, or not to promote out. I didn’t suppose it was going to achieve success in any respect. I didn’t care. I did it as a result of I needed to work with Christopher Walken and I needed to work with John Badham. The script was very very like an old style Hitchcock movie. All of these parts had been intriguing to me so I took it,” Depp mentioned.

How Johnny Depp responded to followers accusing him of promoting out with ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’

Within the early 2000s, Depp hooked up himself to the Pirates of the Caribbeanfranchise. He would quickly lead the Disney journey movie into changing into a multi-billion greenback collection. However equally to Nick of Time, some Depp followers would additionally accuse Depp of promoting out due to its huge success. It was an accusation that Depp didn’t respect.

“I wouldn’t change something, no. As a result of I feel I went into it innocently, and it grew to become what it grew to become,” Depp as soon as instructed The Guardian of his determination to do Pirates. “And now they need to tear me down. Immediately, as quickly as I did Pirates II, they are saying: ‘Oh, he’s promoting out.’ What the f*** does that imply, promoting out? What if I did Ed Wooden II, is that promoting out? I imply, it’s not like I used to be ever wanting to develop into franchise boy, I used to be by no means wanting to develop into something like that. I simply latched on to a character I cherished.”

Continue Reading


Johnny Depp Increases Trouble For Amber Heard As He Now Aims At Turning Around The $2 Million Damages Ordered Against Him?




Johnny Depp and his lawyers fire back at Amber Heard’s latest appeal at the court against the verdict in Virginia court. Read the details now!

Johnny Depp has been embroiled in a legal battle ever since ex-wife Amber Heard accused him of domestic violence. While there remain numerous pieces of evidence that may prove his abuse, many of them have been questioned and even termed fabricated. During the latest trial, he was ordered to pay $2 million in damages after his attorney called the allegations a ‘hoax.’ Scroll below for the latest update on the matter.

As most know, Amber lost the Virginia trial and was ordered to pay damages worth $10.35 million to her ex-husband. She has since then sold her California property and is currently living peacefully in Spain with her baby and girlfriend Bianca Butti. It is said that she doesn’t have that kind of money and may go bankrupt!

Amber Heard has appealed the verdict of the Virginia trial saying the trial shouldn’t have taken place in the first place as the Aquaman actress’ opinions in The Washington Post op-ed were subjective. Her attorneys also claimed that the trial taking place at Fairfax County was unfair to her as it limited her ability to get witnesses to testify for her.

Now, the attorneys of Johnny Depp are firing back at the appeal made by Amber Heard. They claimed that the one account on which the actress was declared victorious was not really related to Depp. It was his attorney who made the remark against the actress and the superstar should be held liable for it.

A report by The Hollywood Reporter claims that the documents stated, “If clients cannot control the details of their attorneys’ work, it makes little sense that clients should nonetheless be held accountable for their attorneys’ tortious actions.”

With Johnny Depp and his lawyer claiming that the superstar should not be at fault, it is now to be seen if the verdict will see a turnover and create further issues forAmber Heard.

Continue Reading